Energy Detection Based Cooperative Spectrum Sensing in Cognitive Radio Networks
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Detection performance of an energy detector used for cooperative spectrum sensing in a cognitive radio network is investigated over channels with both multipath fading and shadowing. The analysis focuses on two fusion strategies: data fusion and decision fusion. Under data fusion, upper bounds for average detection probabilities are derived for four scenarios: 1) single cognitive relay; 2) multiple cognitive relays; 3) multiple cognitive relays with direct link; and 4) multi-hop cognitive relays. Under decision fusion, the exact detection and false alarm probabilities are derived under the generalized "k-out-of-n" fusion rule at the fusion center with consideration of errors in the reporting channel due to fading. The results are extended to a multi-hop network as well. Our analysis is validated by numerical and simulation results. Although this research focuses on Rayleigh multipath fading and lognormal shadowing, the analytical framework can be extended to channels with Nakagami-m multipath fading and lognormal shadowing as well.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it