Functional Incorporation of Chimeric <i>b</i> Subunits into F <sub>1</sub> F <sub>o</sub> ATP Synthase
Bibliographic record
Abstract
F(1)F(o) ATP synthases function by a rotary mechanism. The enzyme's peripheral stalk serves as the stator that holds the F(1) sector and its catalytic sites against the movement of the rotor. In Escherichia coli, the peripheral stalk is a homodimer of identical b subunits, but photosynthetic bacteria have open reading frames for two different b-like subunits thought to form heterodimeric b/b' peripheral stalks. Chimeric b subunit genes have been constructed by substituting sequence from the Thermosynechococcus elongatus b and b' genes in the E. coli uncF gene, encoding the b subunit. The recombinant genes were expressed alone and in combination in the E. coli deletion strain KM2 (Deltab). Although not all of the chimeric subunits were incorporated into F(1)F(o) ATP synthase complexes, plasmids expressing either chimeric b(E39-I86) or b'(E39-I86) were capable of functionally complementing strain KM2 (Deltab). Strains expressing these subunits grew better than cells with smaller chimeric segments, such as those expressing the b'(E39-D53) or b(L54-I86) subunit, indicating intragenic suppression. In general, the chimeric subunits modeled on the T. elongatus b subunit proved to be more stable than the b' subunit in vitro. Coexpression of the b(E39-I86) and b'(E39-I86) subunits in strain KM2 (Deltab) yielded F(1)F(o) complexes containing heterodimeric peripheral stalks composed of both subunits.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".