MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

<i>Dialysis Rounds
A Dialysis Case Presentation and Discussion
Edited by <b>Roger A. Rodby</b></i>: Severe Lactic Acidosis Treated with Prolonged Hemodialysis: Recovery After Massive Overdoses of Metformin

2006· article· en· W2141911227 on OpenAlexaff
Peter Y. F. Guo, Leroy Storsley, S. Neil Finkle

Bibliographic record

VenueSeminars in Dialysis · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicDiabetes Management and Research
Canadian institutionsDalhousie University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineLactic acidosisHemodialysisMetforminAcidosisHemoperfusionRenal replacement therapyDialysisMetabolic acidosisSurgeryAnesthesiaIntensive care medicineInternal medicineInsulin

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We report two cases of severe lactic acidosis due to massive metformin ingestion. The first case was a 37-year-old man who was discovered several hours after ingesting 45 g of metformin. He had severe lactic acidosis (blood pH 6.81, bicarbonate 4 mEq/L, lactate 25.7 mEq/L). Despite intravenous bicarbonate therapy, he decompensated and was placed on a combination of hemodialysis and charcoal hemoperfusion for a continuous time of 25 hours. His hospital course was complicated by acute renal failure requiring a period of intermittent hemodialysis. He has since made a complete recovery. The second case was a 53-year-old man who ingested 50 g of metformin. He also presented with severe lactic acidosis (blood pH 6.85, bicarbonate 3 mEq/L and lactate 28.4 mEq/L) and deteriorated despite intravenous bicarbonate therapy. He was placed on hemodialysis as a continuous therapy for 21 hours. His hospital course was complicated by acute renal failure requiring a period of intermittent hemodialysis. He has subsequently made a complete recovery. Metformin-associated lactic acidosis carries a high mortality rate. Prolonged hemodialysis should be considered as an early treatment option in these cases.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.555
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.004
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.244
Teacher spread0.239 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations84
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSeminars in DialysisSame topicDiabetes Management and ResearchFrench-language works237,207