MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2141914772 · doi:10.18806/tesl.v31i1.1167

Perceptions of People in Canada: Canadian-Born vs. Internationally- Born Postsecondary Students’ Perspectives

2014· article· en· W2141914772 on OpenAlexvenueaboutno aff
Shira Packer, Dana H. Lynch

Bibliographic record

VenueTESL Canada Journal · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicMultilingual Education and Policy
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAcculturationPolitenessOutreachLikert scaleSociologyPedagogyPsychologyLanguage proficiencyQualitative researchImmigrationSocial psychologyEthnic groupPolitical scienceSocial scienceDevelopmental psychologyAnthropology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Explicit sociolinguistic instruction in language classrooms has become more widely accepted than ever, but the understanding and teaching of Canadian cul- ture remains a controversial issue, particularly as Canadian culture becomes increasingly diverse. The degree to which Canadians are perceived to exhibit char- acteristics such as “politeness” and “friendliness” has stirred debate, particularly in ESL (English as a second language) and EAP (English for academic purposes) classrooms, owing to differing personal experiences and acculturation processes. This Canada-wide, mixed-methods study compared Canadian-born (CB) and internationally-born (IB) postsecondary students’ and recent graduates’ percep- tions of people in Canada. Employing social media outreach, the study consisted of an online survey and follow-up e-interviews. Emphasis is given to quantitative rather than qualitative data analysis. Findings suggest that the overall percep- tions of CB and IB groups are more similar than different. However, when un- prompted, CB respondents are more likely than IB respondents to perceive people in Canada as “polite,” “kind,” and “caring.” In addition, Likert-scale results demonstrate that CB respondents are significantly more likely to perceive people in Canada as “funny,” “intelligent,” “caring,” and “hardworking.” Implications are drawn for the degree to which IBs are acculturating to Canadian society and the extent to which a positive acculturation process can be explicitly addressed in ESL/EAP programs.Si l’enseignement explicite de la sociolinguistique dans les cours de langue est plus accepté que jamais, les conceptions et l’enseignement de la culture canadienne de- meurent un sujet controversé, surtout que la culture se diversifie davantage. La mesure dans laquelle l’on perçoit que les Canadiens sont « polis » et « aimables » a suscité des débats, notamment dans les cours d’ALS et d’anglais académique où les expériences personnelles et l’acculturation varient d’une personne à l’autre. Cette étude à méthodologie mixte s’est déroulée à l’échelle du Canada et a com- paré les perceptions de gens au Canada qu’ont des étudiants nés au Canada et nés à l’étranger, au postsecondaire ou récemment diplômés. Profitant des mé- dias sociaux, cette recherche a comporté une enquête et des entrevues de suivi en ligne. Nous avons misé sur une analyse quantitative plutôt que qualitative des données. Les résultats suggèrent que les perceptions globales des deux groupes se ressemblent plus qu’elles ne se distinguent. Toutefois, les étudiants nés au Canada ont proposé spontanément que les Canadiens étaient « polis », « gentils » et « bienveillants » plus souvent que les étudiants nés à l’étranger. De plus, selon une échelle de Likert, les étudiants nés au Canada sont significativement plus portés à percevoir les gens au Canada comme étant « drôles », « intelligents », « attentionnés » et « travaillants ». Nous présentons les incidences liées à la mesure dans laquelle les étudiants nés à l’étranger s’intègrent à la société cana- dienne et les conséquences de la possibilité d’évoquer de façon explicite un proces- sus d’acculturation positive dans les programmes d’ALS et d’anglais académique.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.100
Threshold uncertainty score0.998

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0230.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.355
Teacher spread0.341 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2014
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTESL Canada JournalSame topicMultilingual Education and PolicyFrench-language works237,207