Ingmar Bergman, maternidad y Franquismo: Traducción y censura de En el umbral de la vida
Bibliographic record
Abstract
La politique culturelle développée en Espagne pendant le régime franquiste (1939-1975) était caractérisée par un contrôle strict des répertoires culturels en circulation. Une manifestation très visible de ce protectionnisme culturel était l’établissement d’une censure d’État, qui réglait la production et la diffusion culturelles. En analysant les pratiques de censure étatiques dans En el umbral de la vida (Nära livet, 1958), d’Ingmar Bergman, notre article prétend contribuer à l’étude des façons de traduire de l’époque franquiste. S’inspirant du tournant culturel des études descriptives en traduction, et notamment des notions de mécénat et traduction comme réécriture, développées par Lefevere (1992), notre analyse veut montrer certains partis pris idéologiques qui guidaient la manipulation franquiste du discours filmique bergmanien. Tandis que l’original En el umbral de la vida présentait la maternité de façon ambigüe, la censure effaçait toute référence négative de ce film, favorisant ainsi le tendancieux discours franquiste sur ce phénomène.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.005 | 0.010 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.007 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".