MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2141946900 · doi:10.1139/g07-048

Evolution and function of B chromosome 45S rDNA sequences in<i>Brachycome dichromosomatica</i>

2007· article· en· W2141946900 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Sylvia Marschner, Armin Meister, Frank R. Blattner, Andreas Houben

Bibliographic record

VenueGenome · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicGenomics and Phylogenetic Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBiologyGeneticsB chromosomeChromosomeRibosomal RNAPhylogenetic treeGeneInternal transcribed spacerRibosomal DNANucleolus organizer regionKaryotype

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The origin and activity of 45S rDNA located on micro B chromosomes of the daisy Brachycome dichromosomatica were analysed. The internal transcribed spacer 2 (ITS2) of the 45S rRNA gene was sequenced for micro B, large B, and A chromosomes of B. dichromosomatica cytodeme A2, and conserved differences were identified between sequences originating from A and both types of B chromosomes. Phylogenetic analysis did not identify a species containing an ITS2 sequence more similar to either of the B chromosome sequences than the B. dichromosomatica A chromosome sequences. Thus, an origin of the B chromosomes from A chromosomes at a time prior to the divergence of the 4 cytodemes of B. dichromosomatica is suggested. The frequent (70%) nucleolar non-association of micro B chromosomes suggests inactivity of micro B 45S rDNA.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.217
Teacher spread0.209 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations22
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueGenomeSame topicGenomics and Phylogenetic StudiesFrench-language works237,207