MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2142012996 · doi:10.1190/1.3509465

Streaming potential coupling coefficient of quartz glass bead packs: Dependence on grain diameter, pore size, and pore throat radius

2010· article· en· W2142012996 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueGeophysics · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicGeophysical and Geoelectrical Methods
Canadian institutionsUniversité Laval
Fundersnot available
KeywordsStreaming currentMaterials scienceGrain sizeWork (physics)RADIUSZeta potentialViscosityMineralogyQuartzThermodynamicsComposite materialChemistryElectrokinetic phenomenaPhysicsNanotechnology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract The Helmholtz-Smoluchowski (HS) equation is commonly used to relate the streaming potential coupling coefficient of rocks to their zeta potential, pore fluid dielectric permittivity, conductivity, and viscosity despite it being known for almost 80 years that it does not work well for porous media. One of the problems is that the HS equation contains no implicit dependence on grain size, pore size, or pore throat size. Another has been the lack of high-quality data relating the streaming potential coupling coefficient to rock microstructural parameters. In this, predominantly experimental work, we have measured the streaming potential coupling coefficient for 12 sizes of quartz glass beads and two fluid salinities. A comparison of the new data and the existing data with the conventional HS equation and Revil's grain size-dependent HS model shows the grain size-dependent model to be far superior in describing the data. Recognizing their utility in reservoir characterization, we have developed new equations that describe how the streaming potential coupling coefficient varies with pore diameter and pore throat diameter. We have compared experimental determinations as a function of pore throat diameter with these new relationships and found them to work very well if the ratio of the mean pore diameter to the pore throat diameter is 1.662, which is valid for random arrangement of monodisperse spheres. The zeta potential has also been calculated from the grain size-dependent HS equations and are found to be approximately constant and in agreement with the theoretically predicted values. The equations presented in this paper allow the streaming potential coupling coefficient of a reservoir rock to be calculated as a function of grain size, pore size, and pore throat size.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.926
Threshold uncertainty score0.802

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.224
Teacher spread0.216 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it