Apoptosis During Cardiovascular Development
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Morphogenesis and developmental remodeling of cardiovascular tissues involve coordinated regulation of cell proliferation and apoptosis. In the heart, clear evidence points toward focal apoptosis as a contributor to development of the embryonic outflow tract, cardiac valves, conducting system, and the developing coronary vasculature. Apoptosis in the heart is likely regulated by survival and death signals that are also present in many other tissues. Cell type-specific regulation may be superimposed on general cell death/survival machinery through tissue-specific transcriptional pathways. In the vasculature, apoptosis almost certainly contributes to developmental vessel regression, and it is of proven importance in remodeling of arterial structure in response to local changes in hemodynamics. Physical forces, growth factors, and extracellular matrix drive vascular cell survival pathways, and considerable evidence points to local nitric oxide production as an important but complex regulator of vascular cell death. In both the heart and vasculature, progress has been impeded by inadequate information concerning the incidence of apoptosis, its relative importance compared with the diverse cell behaviors that remodel developing tissues, and by our primitive knowledge concerning regulation of cell death in these tissues. However, tools are now available to better understand apoptosis in normal and abnormal development of cardiovascular structures, and a framework has been established that should lead to considerable progress in the coming years.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".