Estilo de vida e vulnerabilidade social dos adolescentes no Bairro de Felipe Camarão, Natal/RN, 2005
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This study it describes the style of life and vulnerability of the adolescents of the quarter of Felipe Camarão in Natal-RN, in order to understand its behaviors, as identified vulnerabilities. The questionnaire half-structuralized, was applied in the 145 adolescents, between 12-18 years, in the period of january-april of 2005. The drawn style, as the data had been 92.4% know of the importance of if feeding well; 86.9% have preserved sleep; 76.5% have good relation with its parents. However, 86.9% had affirmed not to have leisure area/diversion in the quarter. The 31.0% had not answered on corporal hygiene; 41.4% consume allowed drugs (majority alcohol), while 37.9% ilíctas (majority glue); 51.7% say that they do not talk with nobody on sex, while 30.3% talk with mothers; 38.0% are sexually active, initiate between 13-16 years. The behaviors of the studied adolescents indicate a style of healthful life, while others, not, such as: little participation in the leisure, due to option; consumption of allowed and illicit drugs; the lack of dialogue with parents on sex; precocious sexual relationship, added disfavored the economic and social conditions displays them in adopting a life style that implies in vulnerability.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".