Effects of exotic common reed (<i>Phragmites australis</i>) on wood frog (<i>Lithobates sylvaticus</i>) tadpole development and food availability
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Exotic species contribute to aquatic habitat degradation. In the context of declining amphibian populations, the introduction of alien species has been the subject of numerous studies but few have been dedicated to exotic plants. We hypothesized that the establishment of the exotic common reed (Phragmites australis) in North America would lengthen larval anuran development and decrease the survival rate by modifying habitat structure, changing water characteristics, and decreasing food availability. We tested these hypotheses by studying the larval development of the wood frog (Lithobates sylvaticus) during an experiment in field enclosures. Within each enclosure, we created habitats with three different reed densities (zero, medium, and high). Tadpoles were placed in the enclosures and were followed for six weeks up to metamorphosis, during which we monitored water quality and phytoplankton composition. At the end of the experiment, tadpoles at medium and high reed densities developed more slowly than under the control. However, tadpole survival was similar across treatments. For a given developmental stage, total body length did not differ among treatments. Phytoplankton abundance varied with reed density, and groups known to be consumed by tadpoles were negatively influenced by reed density. We found no impact of reed density on pH, total phenolic concentration, or conductivity. Our results suggest that common reed establishment can influence amphibians with rapid development such as wood frogs. Though larval survival rates were similar across treatments, slower development under high reed densities implies a longer exposure to the risk of the pond drying out and to predators.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".