MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2142284172 · doi:10.1186/1743-8454-7-s1-s51

Temporary tracheostomy required as an infant may be a risk factor for future centrally mediated disordered sleep ventilation

2010· article· en· W2142284172 on OpenAlexaff
Robert Adderley, David Wensley

Bibliographic record

VenueCerebrospinal Fluid Research · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicNeuroscience of respiration and sleep
Canadian institutionsBC Children's HospitalUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineNeurologySleep (system call)Risk factorSleep disordered breathingVentilation (architecture)PediatricsNoninvasive ventilationIntensive care medicineMechanical ventilationAnesthesiaPsychiatryObstructive sleep apneaInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background Children with spina bifida experience lifelong complex medical issues. The problems of locomotion, and neurogenic bowel and bladder are well appreciated, and the necessity of shunting obstructive hydrocephalus is equally well known. There are however, serious, less common problems associated with control of ventilation. Most common is vocal cord dysfunction, with unilateral or bilateral vocal cord paresis, and as a consequence, upper airway obstruction. Rarer still, are patients with life threatening breath holding spells, central apnea, or mixed central and obstructive apnea. In many cases, surgical decompression of the posterior fossa can result in return of vocal cord function, and relief of obstructive apnea. In a few cases tracheostomy is required. With a Chairi II malformation, the upper medulla, where the nuclei of cranial nerves IX and X lie close to the rostral tracts of the respiratory centre, may have an abnormal and tenuous blood supply. The medulla may be compromised by bony pressure or by compromise of the blood supply (herniation or chronic arachnoiditis).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.008
Threshold uncertainty score0.027

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0080.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.071
GPT teacher head0.373
Teacher spread0.302 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCerebrospinal Fluid ResearchSame topicNeuroscience of respiration and sleepFrench-language works237,207