Attachment Styles in Transsexual Patients and Clinical and Nonclinical Control Groups: Comment on Colizzi et al
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) has become a major public health issue and is considered a risk factor for erectile dysfunction (ED). T2DM is also associated with androgen deficiency. However, there have been few basic studies on androgen replacement therapy (ART) for ED treatment in T2DM animal models, and the mechanism underlying the effect of ART on T2DM‐induced ED is unclear.To investigate the effect of ART on ED in T2DM rats by examining inflammatory and nitric oxide (NO)‐related factors.Otsuka Long‐Evans Tokushima Fatty (OLETF) rats and their controls, Long‐Evans Tokushima Otsuka (LETO) rats, were distributed into three groups: LETO, OLETF, and ART. In the ART group, OLETF rats were treated daily with testosterone (3 mg/kg/day, subcutaneously) from 20 to 25 weeks of age; LETO and OLETF rats received vehicle only.We measured erectile function by using measurements of the ratio between intracavernosal pressure (ICP) and mean arterial pressure (MAP) following electrical stimulation of the cavernous nerve and by evaluating the endothelial function of the corpus cavernosum in an isometric tension study. Expression of endothelial NO synthase (eNOS), inducible NO synthase (iNOS), sirtuin‐1 (Sirt1), interleukin‐6 (IL‐6), and tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF‐α) mRNA was detected using polymerase chain reaction.The ICP/MAP ratio in the OLETF group was significantly decreased and that in the ART group was significantly improved (P < 0.01). The response to acetylcholine was significantly decreased in the OLETF group and improved in the ART group (P < 0.01). Although expression of eNOS and Sirt1 mRNA was decreased and that of iNOS, IL‐6, and TNF‐α mRNA was increased in the OLETF group, ART improved mRNA expression.ART suppressed inflammation in rats with T2DM and metabolic disorders and improved their endothelial and erectile functions. ART could be effective for T2DM‐induced ED and may be considered a potential ED treatment method. Kataoka T, Hotta Y, Maeda Y, and Kimura K. Assessment of androgen replacement therapy for erectile function in rats with type 2 diabetes mellitus by examining nitric oxide‐related and inflammatory factors. J Sex Med 2014;11:920–929.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.007 | 0.025 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.004 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.009 | 0.007 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".