Molecular evolution and phylogeny of the<i>atpB-rbcL</i>spacer of chloroplast DNA in the true mosses
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The nucleotide variation of a noncoding region between the atpB and rbcL genes of the chloroplast genome was used to estimate the phylogeny of 11 species of true mosses (subclass Bryidae). The A+T rich (82.6%) spacer sequence is conserved with 48% of bases showing no variation between the ingroup and outgroup. Rooted at liverworts, Marchantia and Bazzania, the monophyly of true mosses was supported cladistically and statistically. A nonparametric Wilcoxon Signed-Ranks test Ts statistic for testing the taxonomic congruence showed no significant differences between gene trees and organism trees as well as between parsimony trees and neighbor-joining trees. The reconstructed phylogeny based on the atpB-rbcL spacer sequences indicated the validity of the division of acrocarpous and pleurocarpous mosses. The size of the chloroplast spacer in mosses fits into an evolutionary trend of increasing spacer length from liverworts through ferns to seed plants. According to the relative rate tests, the hypothesis of a molecular clock was supported in all species except for Thuidium, which evolved relatively fast. The evolutionary rate of the chloroplast DNA spacer in mosses was estimated to be (1.12 +/- 0.019) x 10(-10) nucleotides per site per year, which is close to the nonsynonymous substitution rates of the rbcL gene in the vascular plants. The constrained molecular evolution (total nucleotide substitutions, K approximately 0.0248) of the chloroplast DNA spacer is consistent with the slow evolution in morphological traits of mosses. Based on the calibrated evolutionary rate, the time of the divergence of true mosses was estimated to have been as early as 220 million years ago.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it