MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2142390671 · doi:10.1093/eurheartj/sun002

Clinical benefit and practical use of fondaparinux in the invasive management of patients with acute coronary syndromes

2008· article· en· W2142390671 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueEuropean Heart Journal Supplements · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAcute Myocardial Infarction Research
Canadian institutionsHamilton Health Sciences
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineFondaparinuxIntensive care medicineCardiologyInternal medicineVenous thromboembolismThrombosis

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In patients with high-risk non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndromes (NSTE-ACS), an invasive management strategy has been found to be superior to a conservative strategy. In the real world, ∼50% of patients treated with an invasive strategy require a percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) procedure, whereas the remaining 40–50% are treated medically and a small proportion (<10%) undergo coronary artery bypass graft surgery. Therefore, anti-thrombotic drugs need to be both safe and effective when started early in a broad range of patients with ACS, regardless of ultimate revascularization status. Fondaparinux is the first selective inhibitor of factor Xa approved for use across the whole spectrum of patients with ACS. In patients with NSTE-ACS in the OASIS-5 study, upstream treatment with fondaparinux was found to have superior net clinical benefit compared with enoxaparin in patients undergoing PCI. Fondaparinux reduced death, myocardial infarction, stroke, or major bleeding by 22% compared with enoxaparin (P = 0.004). Even in those undergoing early PCI (i.e. within the first 24 h), there was a 24% relative risk reduction in favour of fondaparinux (P = 0.035). The main benefit was a large 54% reduction in major bleeding (P < 0.001), which was achieved with near identical rates of ischaemic events (6.3 vs. 6.2%). Catheter thrombus occurred with very low incidence in both the fondaparinux and the enoxaparin groups and was virtually eliminated in both groups with adjunctive unfractionated heparin (UFH) administered in the catheterization laboratory just prior to PCI. In the fondaparinux group, the mean dose of UFH was about 50 U/kg. On the basis of these data and the overall results of the OASIS-5 trial, the experts of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association and of the European Society of Cardiology gave fondaparinux a class I recommendation for use in patients with NSTE-ACS undergoing invasive strategy. In practice, fondaparinux is easy to use (fixed dose of 2.5 mg once daily for all patients) and is associated with improved patient outcomes, including those patients managed with an invasive strategy.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.008
Threshold uncertainty score0.312

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.141
GPT teacher head0.395
Teacher spread0.254 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it