MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2142427181 · doi:10.1016/j.ehpc.2015.01.002

Lipomatous angiomyofibroblastoma: A 20-year literature review

2015· article· en· W2142427181 on OpenAlexaff
Julie Guilmette, Philippe Gauthier, Kurosh Rahimi

Bibliographic record

VenueHuman Pathology Case Reports · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicUrologic and reproductive health conditions
Canadian institutionsHôpital Notre-DameCentre Hospitalier de l’Université de Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDesminVimentinMedicineCD34PathologyAggressive angiomyxomaS100 proteinVulvaFemale circumcisionLipomaAnatomyBiologyImmunohistochemistryGynecologyStem cell

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Lipomatous angiomyofibroblastoma (LAMF) is a rare superficial muco-cutaneous tumor of the female genital tract in women of reproductive age and early menopause. We report the case of a 36-year-old woman who presented with an asymptomatic 1 cm round vulvar mass. The tumor showed both hypercellular and hypocellular areas composed of spindle and epithelioid cells set in a loose fibromyxoid background. Anastomosing networks of small to medium sized dilated vessels, surrounded by condensed spindle cells, were distributed equally throughout the tumor. Mature adipocytes comprised more than half of the tumor's volume. The neoplastic cells were reactive for both desmin and vimentin and did not express CD34, smooth muscle actin, S100 protein and muscle-specific actin. Making the right diagnosis may be challenging to medical professionals as LAMF may mimic both clinically and histologically several other benign and malignant gynecological lesions. LAMF has a benign course without evidence of local recurrence or metastatic potential.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: Case report
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.182
Threshold uncertainty score0.630

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.037
GPT teacher head0.334
Teacher spread0.297 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueHuman Pathology Case ReportsSame topicUrologic and reproductive health conditionsFrench-language works237,207