The Site and Nature of Airway Obstruction after Lung Transplantation
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
RATIONALE: The chronic rejection of lung allografts is attributable to progressive small airway obstruction. OBJECTIVES: To determine precisely the site and nature of this type of airway obstruction. METHODS: Lungs from patients with rejected lung allografts treated by a second transplant (n = 7) were compared with unused donor (control) lungs (n = 7) using multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) to determine the percentage of visible airways obstructed in each airway generation, micro-computed tomography (microCT) to visualize the site of obstruction, and histology to determine the nature of this obstruction. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: The number of airways visible with MDCT was not different between rejected and control lungs. However, 10 ± 7% of observed airways greater than 2 mm in diameter, 50 ± 22% of airways between 1 and 2 mm in diameter, and 73 ± 10% of airways less than 1 mm in diameter were obstructed in the rejected lungs. MicroCT confirmed that the mean lumen diameter of obstructed airways was 647 ± 317 μm but showed no difference in either total number and cross-sectional area of the terminal bronchioles or in alveolar dimensions (mean linear intercept) between groups (P > 0.05). In addition, microCT demonstrated that only segments of the airways are obstructed. Histology confirmed a constrictive form of bronchiolitis caused by expansion of microvascular-rich granulation tissue in some locations and collagen-rich scar tissue in others. CONCLUSIONS: Chronic lung allograft rejection is associated with a progressive form of constrictive bronchiolitis that targets conducting airways while sparing larger airways as well as terminal bronchioles and the alveolar surface.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it