Quaternary structure of <scp>W</scp>zzB and <scp>W</scp>zzE polysaccharide copolymerases
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Bacteria have evolved cellular control mechanisms to ensure proper length specification for surface-bound polysaccharides. Members of the Polysaccharide Copolymerase (PCP) family are central to this process. PCP-1 family members are anchored to the inner membrane through two transmembrane helices and contain a large periplasm-exposed domain. PCPs are known to form homooligomers but their exact stoichiometry is controversial in view of conflicting structural and biochemical data. Several prior investigations addressing this question indicated a nonameric, hexameric, or tetrameric organization of several PCP-1 family members. In this work, we gathered additional evidence that E.coli WzzB and WzzE PCPs form octameric homo-oligomeric complexes. Detergent-solubilized PCPs were purified to homogeneity and subjected to blue native gel analysis, which indicated the presence of a predominant high-molecular product of over 500 kDa in mass. Molecular mass of WzzE and WzzB-detergent oligomers was estimated to be 550 kDA by size-exclusion coupled to multiangle laser light scattering (SEC-MALLS). Oligomeric organization of purified WzzB and WzzE was further investigated by negative stain electron microscopy and by X-ray crystallography, respectively. Analysis of EM-derived molecular envelope of WzzB indicated that the full-length protein is composed of eight protomers. Crystal structure of LDAO-solubilized WzzE was solved to 6 Å resolutions and revealed its octameric subunit stoichiometry. In summary, we identified a possible biological unit utilized for the glycan chain length determination by two PCP-1 family members. This provides an important step toward further unraveling of the mechanistic basis of chain length control of the O-antigen and the enterobacterial common antigen.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".