MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2142462489 · doi:10.1093/jat/32.4.303

Determination of p-tert-Octylphenol in Blood and Tissues by Gas Chromatography Coupled with Mass Spectrometry

2008· article· en· W2142462489 on OpenAlexaff
G. Hamelin, Ginette Charest‐Tardif, Kannan Krishnan, Daniel G. Cyr, Michel Charbonneau, Patrick J. Devine, Sami Haddad, Gerard M. Cooke, Timothy Schrader, Robert Tardif

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Analytical Toxicology · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicEffects and risks of endocrine disrupting chemicals
Canadian institutionsUniversity of OttawaHealth CanadaUniversité du Québec à MontréalInstitut National de la Recherche ScientifiqueUniversité de Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsChemistryChromatographyAcetic anhydrideDetection limitMass spectrometryGas chromatographyGas chromatography–mass spectrometryExtraction (chemistry)Selected ion monitoringQuantitative analysis (chemistry)CatalysisBiochemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A sensitive and reproducible procedure using gas chromatography coupled with mass spectrometry is described for the determination of p-tert-octylphenol (OP), a persistent degradation product of alkylphenol ethoxylates that binds to the estrogen receptor in blood and tissues. The first step involved the extraction of blood (200 microL) or tissue homogenate (400 microL) with methyl tert-butyl ether, including p-tert-butylphenol (BP) as internal standard. After extraction, the sample was evaporated to dryness with a gentle stream of nitrogen at 45 degrees C, and OP and BP were derivatized with an acetylation reaction involving acetic anhydride and catalyzed by pyridine. Samples were then analyzed by a gas chromatograph equipped with a mass spectrometer (single ion monitoring) with a Varian VF-5ms capillary column. The limit of detection and the limit of quantification of the method in blood were 4.6 and 15.5 ng/mL, respectively. The linearity and reproducibility of the method were acceptable, with coefficients of variation of approximately 10% for blood and ranging between 9% and 27% for tissues. This method was applied to the determination of unchanged OP in blood and tissues obtained from Sprague-Dawley rats after oral and IV OP administration.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.085
Threshold uncertainty score0.277

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.291
Teacher spread0.284 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations12
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Analytical ToxicologySame topicEffects and risks of endocrine disrupting chemicalsFrench-language works237,207