MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2142468768 · doi:10.1080/01902140701807779

ROLE OF TOLL-LIKE RECEPTOR 4 IN LUNG INFLAMMATION FOLLOWING EXPOSURE TO SWINE BARN AIR

2008· article· en· W2142468768 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueExperimental Lung Research · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicIndoor Air Quality and Microbial Exposure
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Saskatchewan
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTLR4InflammationBarnToll-like receptorLungImmunologyCytokineReceptorBiologyMedicineInternal medicineImmune systemInnate immune system

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The authors tested a hypothesis that lung inflammation and airway hyperresponsiveness (AHR) induced following barn air exposure are dependent on Toll-like receptor 4 (TLR4) by exposing C3HeB/FeJ (intact TLR4, wild type [WT]) and C3H/HeJ (defective TLR4, mutant) mice either to the barn air (8 hours/day for 1, 5, or 20 days) or ambient air. Both strains of mice, compared to their respective controls, showed increased AHR following 5 exposures but dampened AHR after 20 exposures to show lack of effect of TLR4 on AHR. However, swine barn air induced lung inflammation with recruitment of inflammatory cells and cytokine expression was observed in WT but not in mutant mice. These data show different roles of TLR4 in lung inflammation and AHR in mice exposed to swine barn air.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.019
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.319
Teacher spread0.298 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it