MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2142471893 · doi:10.1152/jappl.2001.90.5.1631

Respiratory mechanics and lung development in the rat from early age to adulthood

2001· article· en· W2142471893 on OpenAlexaff
R. F. M. Gomes, Felix R. Shardonofsky, David H. Eidelman, Jason H. T. Bates

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Applied Physiology · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicNeonatal Respiratory Health Research
Canadian institutionsMcGill UniversityChristie (Canada)
FundersNational Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute
KeywordsRespiratory physiologyLungRespiratory systemMedicineLung functionCardiologyInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The purpose of the present study was to establish how the dependence of respiratory mechanics on lung inflation changes during development. We studied seven groups of rats from 10 days to 3 mo of age at five levels of positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) from 0 to 7 hPa (1 hPa = 0.1 kPa approximately 1 cmH(2)O). At each PEEP level, we measured respiratory system resistance and elastance at both 0.9 and 4.8 Hz to partition the mechanical properties into its airway and tissue components. Elastance increased more rapidly with PEEP in the younger animals, which we interpret as reflecting a more pronounced strain stiffening of the younger parenchyma. However, the decrease in airway resistance with PEEP was more pronounced in the older animals. Morphometric analysis showed that mean tissue density decreased and total alveolar surface area increased with age. Our data suggest that the mechanical interdependence between airways and parenchyma is weaker in very young animals compared with mature animals. This may play a role in the hyperresponsiveness of immaturity.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.848
Threshold uncertainty score0.318

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.039
GPT teacher head0.341
Teacher spread0.302 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations59
Published2001
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Applied PhysiologySame topicNeonatal Respiratory Health ResearchFrench-language works237,207