MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2142473360 · doi:10.1109/mwsym.2005.1516556

Domain Decomposition FDTD Algorithm Combining with Numerical TL Calibration Technique for Parameter Extraction of Substrate Integrated Circuits

2005· article· en· W2142473360 on OpenAlexaff
Feng Xu, Ke Wu

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE MTT-S International Microwave Symposium Digest, 2005. · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMicrowave Engineering and Waveguides
Canadian institutionsPolytechnique Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFinite-difference time-domain methodDomain decomposition methodsCalibrationElectronic circuitComputer scienceAlgorithmExtraction (chemistry)Substrate (aquarium)DecompositionDomain (mathematical analysis)Electronic engineeringMathematicsOpticsEngineeringElectrical engineeringPhysicsChemistryFinite element methodMathematical analysis

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The substrate integrated waveguide (SIW) is useful for the design of millimeter-wave planar circuits such as filters, resonators and antennas. In this paper, an efficient hybrid algorithm called the domain decomposition finite difference time domain (DD-FDTD) method combining with a new numerical through-line (TL) calibration technique, is proposed and developed for the accurate parameter extraction of substrate integrated circuits (SICs). By means of this calibration technique, the FDTD method can be used to extract the circuit parameters of planar SIC discontinuities. The use of the domain decomposition can largely simplify the procedure of programming and simulation, increase the reliability of simulation, and make the adoption of distributed computing more convenient. The introduction of the TL calibration technique not only makes it possible to use the FDTD method to extract the parameters of SICs, but also accurately obtain the unknown complex propagation constant of the SIW simultaneously. Simulation and measurement results have verified this hybrid algorithm.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.811
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.242
Teacher spread0.233 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE MTT-S International Microwave Symposium Digest, 2005.Same topicMicrowave Engineering and WaveguidesFrench-language works237,207