Three‐Week Thyroxine Withdrawal: A Thyroid‐Specific Quality of Life Study
Bibliographic record
Abstract
OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESIS: The purpose of this study is to determine the impact of a 3-week T4 withdrawal test on the quality of life (QOL) of patients undergoing investigation for residual/recurrent well-differentiated thyroid cancer. STUDY DESIGN: Prospective survey study. METHODS: 181 patients with well-differentiated thyroid cancer were surveyed using a thyroid-specific QOL-thyroid survey at three times throughout the study: prior to T4 withdrawal, after the 3-week withdrawal period, and 4 weeks after resuming T3/T4 combination therapy. RESULTS: A very small, though statistically significant, reduction was observed in the four domains of QOL defined by the QOL-thyroid survey from baseline values to 3 weeks after T4 withdrawal. The maximal difference was 2.04 (fatigue), out of a possible 10 point score, in the physical well-being category. CONCLUSIONS: The thyroid-specific QOL questionnaire demonstrates a statistically significant though very small and probably not clinically significant reduction in the QOL of thyroid cancer patients undergoing an induced 3-week hypothyroid state. Three-week T4 withdrawal is a simple, cost-effective, and readily available test.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".