MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2142510732 · doi:10.5455/bcp.20140903110206

Neurological Structure Variations in Individuals with Autism Spectrum Disorder: a Review

2014· review· en· W2142510732 on OpenAlexaff
Sudhakar Sivapalan, Katherine J. Aitchison

Bibliographic record

VenueKlinik Psikofarmakoloji Bülteni-Bulletin of Clinical Psychopharmacology · 2014
Typereview
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicAutism Spectrum Disorder Research
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAutism spectrum disorderNeuroimagingPsychologyAutismNeuroscienceWhite matterFrontal lobeAmygdalaGrey matterCognitive psychologyDevelopmental psychologyMagnetic resonance imagingMedicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Autism spectrum disorder is a neurodevelopmental disorder that is characterized by impairments in social communication and social interactions along with repetitive, stereotyped behaviors and interests. The spectrum is quite broad, and the pathophysiology appears to be related to a number of factors. A common theme is that the disorder is one of impaired brain development. Neuroimaging studies offer a way to investigate impaired brain development by considering structural differences between those with autism and those without. Areas of focus include neuroanatomical regions that correlate with the clinically recognizable features of autism. In this review of structural studies, volumetric variation in terms of grey and white matter and total brain volume and in terms of neurological structures (e.g. frontal lobe, parietal cortex, amygdala, etc.) is discussed. Although a few trends have been noted, much of the literature demonstrates heterogeneity in the reported findings, which likely reflects the heterogeneity of the clinical presentation of this disorder. Further studies will need to correlate these structural findings with functional data and look to better understand the underlying molecular and genetic processes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.009

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0060.004
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.069
GPT teacher head0.451
Teacher spread0.382 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueKlinik Psikofarmakoloji Bülteni-Bulletin of Clinical PsychopharmacologySame topicAutism Spectrum Disorder ResearchFrench-language works237,207