RNA sequencing reveals the role of splicing polymorphisms in regulating human gene expression
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Expression levels of many human genes are under the genetic control of expression quantitative trait loci (eQTLs). Despite technological advances, the precise molecular mechanisms underlying most eQTLs remain elusive. Here, we use deep mRNA sequencing of two CEU individuals to investigate those mechanisms, with particular focus on the role of splicing control loci (sQTLs). We identify a large number of genes that are differentially spliced between the two samples and associate many of those differences with nearby single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs). Subsequently, we investigate the potential effect of splicing SNPs on eQTL control in general. We find a significant enrichment of alternative splicing (AS) events within a set of highly confident eQTL targets discovered in previous studies, suggesting a role of AS in regulating overall gene expression levels. Next, we demonstrate high correlation between the levels of mature (exonic) and unprocessed (intronic) RNA, implying that ∼75% of eQTL target variance can be explained by control at the level of transcription, but that the remaining 25% may be regulated co- or post-transcriptionally. We focus on eQTL targets with discordant mRNA and pre-mRNA expression patterns and use four examples: USMG5, MMAB, MRPL43, and OAS1, to dissect the exact downstream effects of the associated genetic variants.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".