Mapping the lethal factor and edema factor binding sites on oligomeric anthrax protective antigen
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Assembly of anthrax toxin complexes at the mammalian cell surface involves competitive binding of the edema factor (EF) and lethal factor (LF) to heptameric oligomers and lower order intermediates of PA(63), the activated carboxyl-terminal 63-kDa fragment of protective antigen (PA). We used sequence differences between PA(63) and homologous PA-like proteins to delineate a region within domain 1' of PA that may represent the binding site for these ligands. Substitution of alanine for any of seven residues in or near this region (R178, K197, R200, P205, I207, I210, and K214) strongly inhibited ligand binding. Selected mutations from this set were introduced into two oligomerization-deficient PA mutants, and the mutants were used in various combinations to map the single ligand site within dimeric PA(63). The site was found to span the interface between two adjacent subunits, explaining the dependence of ligand binding on PA oligomerization. The locations of residues comprising the site suggest that a single ligand molecule sterically occludes two adjacent sites, consistent with the finding that the PA(63) heptamer binds a maximum of three ligand molecules. These results elucidate the process by which the components of anthrax toxin, and perhaps other binary bacterial toxins, assemble into toxic complexes.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".