MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2142580097 · doi:10.1002/cplu.201300308

Influence of Chromophore Length and Acceptor Groups on the Optical Properties of Rigidified Merocyanine Dyes

2013· article· en· W2142580097 on OpenAlexafffund
Katharina Christina Kreß, Thomas Fischer, Joachim Stumpe, Wolfgang Frey, Melanie Raith, Omid Beiraghi, S. Holger Eichhorn, Stefan Tussetschläger, Sabine Laschat

Bibliographic record

VenueChemPlusChem · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicPhotochromic and Fluorescence Chemistry
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Windsor
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaCompute CanadaCarl-Zeiss-Stiftung
KeywordsSolvatochromismMerocyanineMalononitrileChromophoreSubstituentPhotochemistryMoietyChemistryAcceptorSpectroscopyAbsorption spectroscopyIsophoronePhotochromismMoleculeOrganic chemistryOptics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Three series of rigidified tri-, penta- and heptamethine merocyanine dyes were synthesised. A piperidyl moiety was chosen as the electron-donating substituent while the electron-accepting group was varied from ketones to malononitriles and cyanoacetates. The structures of the compounds in the solid state and in solution were elucidated by X-ray diffraction and NMR spectroscopy, respectively, while optical properties were investigated by absorption and emission spectroscopy. As a general trend, the acceptor properties decrease in the series malononitrile>cyanoacetate>ketone based on the analysis of their solvatochromic behaviour. The experimental results were further supported by calculations at the B3LYP 6-311+G(d) level of theory.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.208
Teacher spread0.191 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations27
Published2013
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueChemPlusChemSame topicPhotochromic and Fluorescence ChemistryFrench-language works237,207