MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2142777190 · doi:10.3109/02703181.2010.532582

The Power of the Social Environment in Motivating Persons with Dementia to Engage in Occupation: Qualitative Findings

2010· article· en· W2142777190 on OpenAlex
Jodi Teitelman, Christine Raber, Janet Watts

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysical & Occupational Therapy In Geriatrics · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicGeriatric Care and Nursing Homes
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsVolition (linguistics)DementiaPsychologyDocumentationQualitative researchOccupational therapyFocus groupMedicineDiseasePsychiatrySociology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A key element in persons with dementia's occupational engagement is the degree to which the social environment supports participation. This article summarizes the results of a qualitative study of eight assisted living facility residents, that explored volition in persons with moderate dementia. Extensive interviewing and observation were followed by the primary researcher's engagement and documentation of each resident in therapeutic activity sessions. Data were analyzed using van Manen's phenomenological approach, and three themes emerged. One, potency of the social environment, is the focus of this article. From the eight participants, two case studies are presented, one demonstrating the positive impact of therapeutic communication and social support on volitional behavior and occupational engagement and the other demonstrating the inhibiting effect of lack of therapeutic social interaction. Each case is analyzed using Epp's (2003, Person-centred dementia care: A vision to be refined. The Canadian Alzheimer's Disease Review, 14–18) Person-Centered Care model techniques and interaction modes recommended by Taylor's (2008, The intentional relationship: Occupational therapy and use of self. Philadelphia: F.A. Davis.) Intentional Relationship Model. The article concludes with recommendations for promoting positive social interactions at the client, staff/family, and systems levels.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.428
Threshold uncertainty score0.413

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.053
GPT teacher head0.420
Teacher spread0.366 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it