Characteristics of a cluster of xylanase genes in<i>Fibrobacter succinogenes</i>S85
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Xylanase genes xyn10D, xyn10E, and xyn10B, located sequentially on the Fibrobacter succinogenes S85 chromosome, were separately cloned and their properties characterized. Analysis of the sequences documented that xylanases Xyn10D, Xyn10E, and Xyn10B each consist of an N-terminal catalytic domain (glycosyl hydrolase family 10) and a C-terminal carbohydrate-binding module (CBM, family 6) connected by proline-rich linker sequences. The amino acid sequences exhibited similarities of between 53 and 60%. The xyn10D, xyn10E, and truncated xyn10deltaACBM were expressed in Escherichia coli and purified to homogeneity. The purified Xyn10D, Xyn10E, and Xyn10BdeltaCBM exhibited the same temperature optimum (40 degrees C) and pH optimum (6.5) and the highest specific activity against arabinoxylan, oat spelt xylan, and birchwood xylan, respectively. Xyn10D exhibited an affinity for cellulose and xylan with 47 and 33% binding, respectively, while the truncated Xyn10DdeltaCBM did not bind to the substrates. The main hydrolysis products of the three xylanases acting on oat spelt xylan and arabinoxylan were xylose and xylobiose. RT-PCR analysis showed that the three genes were co-transcribed as a single transcript. Western immunoblot analysis revealed that the three xylanases were expressed at a very low level by F. succinogenes grown on either glucose or cellulose as the source of carbohydrate.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".