Small subunit rDNA phylogeny shows the lichen families Caliciaceae and Physciaceae (Lecanorales, Ascomycotina) to form a monophyletic group
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A phylogenetic analysis based on small subunit (SSU) rDNA sequences shows the lecanoralean lichen families Caliciaceae and Physciaceae form a well-supported monophyletic group within the order Lecanorales (Ascomycotina). Support for this relationship is present from anatomical data, in particular data from spore ontogeny, where close similarities between the pattern of development of spore surface structures in the two families are pointed out. The Caliciaceae-Physciaceae group is characterized by having thick-walled, pigmented spores, often with a distinctive ornamentation which is usually formed either from strongly melanized parts of the perispore, separated by nonmelanized, gelatinous parts that eventually dissolve, or by cracks in the perispore. The relationship to the Teloschistaceae, sometimes suggested as a possible sister-group to the Physciaceae, was not supported by jackknifing, but cannot be rejected with the present data. There is no support for the suggested order Teloschistales. A brief discussion of the evolution of the prototunicate ascus in the Lecanorales is given. New SSU rDNA sequences were produced from Buellia disciformis (Fr.) Mudd. and Physcia aipolia (Humb.) Fürnr. (Physciaceae), Cladonia sulphurina (Michx.) Fr. (Cladoniaceae), Cyphelium tigillare (Ach.) Ach. (Caliciaceae), and Caloplaca flavorubescens (Huds.) J.R. Laundon and Xanthoria parietina (L.) Th.Fr. (Teloschistaceae).Key words: 18S, fungi, lichens, molecular phylogeny, ribosomal DNA.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".