MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2142920924 · doi:10.1109/oceans.1993.326156

ODIN: a new ocean data and information network for the St. Lawrence river and the Atlantic Canada region

2002· article· en· W2142920924 on OpenAlexaffabout
Bernard Tessier, Denis Hains, Patrick Hally, C.T. O’Reilly, S. de Margerie

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicAdvanced Computational Techniques and Applications
Canadian institutionsBedford Institute of OceanographyCanadian Hydrographic Service
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHydrographyOceanographyDisseminationEnvironmental scienceSalinityPopulationChannel (broadcasting)Hydrographic surveyGeographyEnvironmental resource managementComputer scienceGeologyTelecommunications

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Atmospheric and water properties information are keys to the understanding of our environment. Along the coastline, the harmonious coexistence between the environment and economic growth is continually challenged by the large population and the anthropogenic impacts on the coastal waters. This paper describes concepts, components and benefits around the development of the new Canadian Ocean Data and Information Network (ODIN). This environmental monitoring and disseminating system, called ODIN and previously COWLIS (Coastal Ocean Water Level Information System), has been operating since 1990 to monitor, validate, predict and disseminate water levels from tide gauges owned by the Canadian Hydrographic Service. Main ports throughout Canada, in particular on the St. Lawrence River, are served by ODIN. This system is being installed in Quebec Region as part of a ship draft management system and in the Atlantic Canada Region For different oceanographic and hydrographic purposes. ODIN is being expended to include other coastal parameters such as temperature, salinity and weather.< <ETX xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">&gt;</ETX>

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.711
Threshold uncertainty score0.989

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.032
GPT teacher head0.242
Teacher spread0.210 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2002
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAdvanced Computational Techniques and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207