A digenic cause of cleft lip in A‐strain mice and definition of candidate genes for the two loci
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Nonsyndromic cleft lip with or without cleft palate, CL(P), is a common human birth defect with a complex unknown genetic cause. The mouse model is the "A/-" strains. Our previous studies mapped two loci: clf1 on Chr11 and clf2 on Chr13--with a strong genetic maternal effect on the level of risk. Here we test the hypothesis that CL(P) is digenic and identify candidate genes for clf1 and clf2. METHODS: We observed E14 CL(P) frequencies in backcross (BC1) embryos from a new cross of A/WySn to AXB-4/Pgn and from test crosses of three new "congenic RI" lines. Using new polymorphic markers from genes and our mapping panels of segregants and RI strains, we identified the candidate genes for clf1 and clf2. We sequenced the coding region of Ptch in A/WySn cDNA. RESULTS: Seventy new BC1 CL(P) segregants (4%) were obtained, as predicted. All three new congenic RI lines homozygous for both clf1 and clf2 had A/WySn-level CL(P) frequencies (10-30%) in test crosses. The clf1 region contains 10 known genes (Arf2, Cdc27, Crhr1, Gosr2, Itgb3, Mapt, Myl4, Nsf, Wnt3, and Wnt9b). The clf2 region contains 17 known genes with human orthologs. Both regions contain additional potential genes. No causal mutation in Ptch coding sequence was found. CONCLUSIONS: In A-strain mice, nonsyndromic CL(P) is digenic, suggesting that nonsyndromic human CL(P) may also be digenic. The orthologous human genes are on 17q (clf1) and 9q, 8q and 5p (clf2), and good candidate genes are WNT3 or WNT9B (17q), and PTCH (9q) or MTRR (5p).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".