Circadian Rhythm of Irinotecan Tolerability in Mice
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The toxicity of irinotecan (CPT-11), a topoisomerase-I inhibitor largely used in cancer patients, was investigated as a function of the circadian time of its administration in mice, with mortality, body weight loss, leukopenia, neutropenia, intestinal lesions, and bone marrow cell cycle phase distribution as end points. Four experiments were performed on a total of 773 male mice standardized with 12h light/12h darkness. Irinotecan was administered daily for 4 or 10 consecutive days (D1-4 and D1-10, respectively, in different experiments) at one of six circadian stages expressed in hours after light onset (HALO). The survival curves differed significantly as a function of the dosage and circadian time of drug administration by the D1-10 schedule, with 70% survival at 7 or 11 HALO and 51% at 19 or 23 HALO (p=0.039 from log rank test). CPT-11 administration at 19 or 23 HALO resulted in (1) greatest mean body weight loss at nadir; (2) most severe colic and bone marrow lesions and/or slowest recovery; and (3) deepest neutropenia nadir and/or slowest hematologic recovery. These circadian treatment time-related differences were statistically validated. The bone marrow cell cycle data revealed a four to eight-fold larger G2-M phase arrest following irinotecan administration at 19 or 23 HALO in comparison to the other times of drug administration, apparently representative of the repair of more extensive DNA damage (p < 0.001 from ANOVA) when the medication was given at these circadian times. Overall, CPT-11 was better tolerated by mice treated during the light (animals' rest) span. The results support the administration of CPT-11 to cancer patients in the second half of the night, during sleep, in order to improve drug tolerability.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".