The combined CXCR1/CXCR2 antagonist CXCL8(3–74)K11R/G31P blocks neutrophil infiltration, pyrexia, and pulmonary vascular pathology in endotoxemic animals
Bibliographic record
Abstract
CXC chemokine receptor 2 (CXCR2) antagonism alone can reduce neutrophil infiltration of some inflammatory sites, but the CXCR1 and CXCR2 critically regulate neutrophil responses to Glu-Leu-Arg-CXC chemokines. Herein, we assessed a combined CXCR1/CXCR2 antagonist, CXC chemokine ligand 8(3-74) [CXCL8(3-74)]K11R/G31P, for its ability to blunt neutrophil-influx and ancillary pathology in severe endotoxemia. Guinea pigs challenged via the airways with Escherichia coli lipopolysaccharide (LPS; 5 microg/kg) were given CXCL8(3-74)K11R/G31P (subcutaneously) before or after the onset of symptoms. The airways of the LPS-challenged animals contained high levels of endogenous pyrogens interleukin (IL)-1 and tumor necrosis factor (TNF) at 2-4 h, and the animals developed pyrexia, which peaked at approximately 6 h; strong pulmonary, neutrophilic inflammation; and marked pleural hemorrhagic consolidation, as assessed at approximately 15 h. CXCL8(3-74)K11R/G31P treatment before LPS challenge reduced lung pleural hemorrhagic consolidation and airway neutrophilia by >90% and essentially abrogated the IL-1, TNF, and fever responses. When given 3 or 6 h after LPS, CXCL8(3-74)K11R/G31P reduced pulmonary neutrophilia by up to 85% and pleural hemorrhagic consolidation by 50-85%. The 3-h treatment reduced the 6- to 24-h fever response to background. Delays of 6 or 9 h in beginning treatment had significant effects on the fever decay curve, but only the 6-h treatment had a significant effect on the 24-h fever. These results indicate that combined CXCR1/CXCR2 antagonism can have significant therapeutic effects on pulmonary inflammation and hemorrhage, as well as pyrexia in endotoxemic animals.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".