MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2143168873 · doi:10.1242/jcs.02829

Sp1 and Sp3 foci distribution throughout mitosis

2006· article· en· W2143168873 on OpenAlexaff
Shihua He, James Davie

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Cell Science · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicGenomics and Chromatin Dynamics
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Manitoba
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBiologyMitosisCell biologyMetaphaseMolecular biologyColocalizationInterphaseGeneticsGeneChromosome

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The mammalian transcription factors Sp1 and Sp3 compete for the same DNA binding sites but play different roles in the regulation of expression of numerous genes. It is known that, in the interphase nucleus, Sp1 and Sp3 are organized into distinct foci. In this study, we show that throughout the mitotic process, while being displaced from the condensed chromosomes and dispersed throughout the cell, Sp1 and Sp3 maintain their separate punctate distributions. In metaphase, both Sp1 and Sp3 foci show a high degree of colocalization with microfilaments, suggesting that F-actin is involved in the organization of Sp1 and Sp3 foci during mitosis. Constant Sp1 and Sp3 levels were observed during mitosis, signifying a recovery of the pre-existing Sp1 and Sp3 population in newly formed nuclei. In late telophase, Sp1 and Sp3 are equally segregated between daughter cells, and their subnuclear organization as distinct foci is restored in a sequential fashion with Sp3 regrouping into the newly formed nuclei prior to Sp1. Both Sp1 and Sp3 return to the nuclei ahead of RNA polymerase II. Our results support a model in which entry of Sp1, Sp3 and RNA polymerase II into the newly formed nuclei is an ordered process.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.049
Threshold uncertainty score0.175

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.003
GPT teacher head0.214
Teacher spread0.211 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations40
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Cell ScienceSame topicGenomics and Chromatin DynamicsFrench-language works237,207