A Microsensor for the Detection of a Single Pathogenic Bacterium Using Magnetotactic Bacteria-based Bio-carriers: Simulations and Preliminary Experiments
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The proposed Magnetotactic Bacteria (MTB) based bio-carrier has the potential to greatly improve pathogenic bacteria detection time, specificity, and sensitivity. Microbeads are attached to the MTB and are modified with a coating of an antibody or phage that is specific to the target pathogenic bacteria. Using magnetic fields, the modified MTB are swept through a solution and the target bacteria present become attached to the microbeads (due to the coating). Then, the MTB are brought to the detection region and the number of pathogenic bacteria is determined. The high swimming speed and controllability of the MTB make this method ideal for the fast detection of small concentrations of specific bacteria. This paper focuses on an impedimetric detection system that will be used to identify if a target bacterium is attached to the microbead. The proposed detection system measures changes in electrical impedance as objects (MTB, microbeads, and pathogenic bacteria) pass through a set of microelectrodes embedded in a microfluidic device. FEM simulation is used to acquire the optimized parameters for the design of such a system. Specifically, factors such as electrode/detection channel geometry, object size and position, which have direct effects on the detection sensitivity for a single bacterium or microparticle, are investigated. Polymer microbeads and the MTB system with an E. coli bacterium are considered to investigate their impedance variations. Furthermore, preliminary experimental data using a microfabricated microfluidic device connected to an impedance analyzer are presented.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".