Expression and Regulation of CC Class Chemokines in the Dystrophic (mdx) Diaphragm
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In the murine (mdx) model of Duchenne muscular dystrophy, dystrophic changes are much more severe in the diaphragm than in limb muscles, and the diaphragm more closely resembles the human disease phenotype. Chemokines could play a central role in governing such phenotypic differences, as inflammation is an important disease modifier. Here we report that CC chemokine receptors (CCRs 1, 2, 3, 5) and ligands (macrophage inflammatory protein-1alpha, RANTES) are expressed at higher levels in dystrophic than in wild-type muscles across age groups (6, 12, and 24 wk). Moreover, chemokine ligand expression and muscle inflammation are significantly higher in dystrophic diaphragms than in limb muscles of the same animals. In vitro, CCR1 is constitutively expressed by cultured primary diaphragmatic myotubes. Stimulation of myotubes by proinflammatory cytokines (tumor necrosis factor-alpha, interleukin-1alpha, interferon-gamma) found within the in vivo dystrophic muscle environment, upregulates CCR1 in mdx and wild-type cultures, and also increases expression of its ligand RANTES to a significantly greater degree in the mdx group. Taken together, our results suggest that CC chemokines may play an important role in sustaining inflammation within the mdx diaphragm, which could help account for its more severe phenotype and also offer a target for therapeutic intervention in Duchenne patients.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".