Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To explore the role and function of nurses in the healthcare design industry. BACKGROUND: The design of a new hospital requires collaboration among multiple disciplines to develop an environment that allows for high-quality care to be delivered and received. This article investigates the role of nurses as an integral part of the design team when creating optimal spaces for patients and caregivers. While nurses fulfill many roles in healthcare, this investigation focused on the role of nurses as end-users, nurse leaders, and consultants. METHODS: An informal interview method was used to elicit information from 13 members of the healthcare design industry across disciplines and across the United States. Those interviewed included nurses, architects, and consultants. RESULTS: Common themes that emerged from this investigation included the importance of nurses as an integral part of the design team and a continued need to understand optimal utilization to be an effective team member. A number of organizations and events welcome nurses to help foster design innovation and interprofessional collaboration. CONCLUSIONS: The role of the professional nurse continues to expand and there are many opportunities for nurses to step out of their traditional role and into the industry of healthcare design. KEYWORDS: Design process, interdisciplinary, nursing, strategy, planning.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.012 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it