MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2143287743 · doi:10.1109/tnsre.2003.817675

Effects of muscle immobilization at different lengths on tetrodotoxin-induced disuse atrophy

2003· article· en· W2143287743 on OpenAlexaff
A.C. Dupont Salter, F.J.R. Richmond, Gerald E. Loeb

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering · 2003
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicSpinal Cord Injury Research
Canadian institutionsQueen's University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAtrophySciatic nerveMuscle atrophyAnkleSoleus muscleAnatomyParalysisMedicineTibialis anterior muscleChemistryInternal medicineSkeletal muscleSurgery

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Previous studies have shown that immobilization causes muscle atrophy and that the rate of atrophy depends on the length at which the muscle is immobilized. However, most studies have been carried out in neurologically intact animals that were capable of generating at least some voluntary muscle activation. In this study, tetrodotoxin was applied chronically to the rat sciatic nerve to produce complete paralysis of distal muscles for seven days, and the ankle was immobilized to hold the muscles at long or short lengths. Paralysis without immobilization resulted in relative weight losses of 36% for soleus, 19% for tibialis anterior (TA), and 17% for lateral gastrocnemius (LG) muscles. Casting the ankle in plantarflexion stretched TA and reduced its weight loss to 10%. Soleus and LG were shortened by this intervention and had increased losses of 43% and 28%, respectively. Fixing the limb in dorsiflexion resulted in a posture similar to that adopted by the unrestrained rats and had no significant effect on the amount of muscle atrophy compared to that in unrestrained paralyzed animals.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.201
Threshold uncertainty score0.608

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.266
Teacher spread0.254 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations18
Published2003
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation EngineeringSame topicSpinal Cord Injury ResearchFrench-language works237,207