Green Healthcare: You Are What You Serve: Healthy and Environmentally Friendly Food Service
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The quality of hospital food has long been the butt of comedians' jokes. More recently, hospitals have also been criticized for serving fast food. One recent U.S. survey, for example, found that 38% of top U.S. hospitals -six of the 16 "Honor Roll"hospitals listed by US News & World Report's 2001 ranking of "America's Best Hospitals"-have fast-food franchises on site (<www.med.umich.edu/opm/newspage/2002/fastfood.htm, June 12, 2002>). Gottlieb and Shaffer found that more than 25% of 47 U.S. children's hospitals had fast-food franchises within them (<http://csf.colorado.edu/archive/2002/food_security/ msg00896.html>). Meanwhile, a 1997 report from Toronto's Food Policy Council entitled "If the Health Care System Believed You Are What You Eat,"suggested that we need to transform hospital food service systems into facilities providing healthy food choices and local food (<www.city.toronto.on.ca/health/ tfpc_health.pdf>).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".