MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2143348896 · doi:10.1093/spp/31.3.250

Part-timers in academia

2004· article· en· W2143348896 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Tiago Santos Pereira

Bibliographic record

VenueScience and Public Policy · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicCanadian Identity and History
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLibrary scienceMedia studiesHumanitiesPolitical scienceSociologyArtComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Journal Article Part-timers in academia Get access Hidden Academics: Contract Faculty in Canadian Universities by Indhu Rajagopal University of Toronto Press, Toronto, 2002, £42, 0-8020-4258-9 (hardback), £18, 0-8020-8098-7 (paperback) Tiago Santos Pereira Tiago Santos Pereira CES (Centre for Social Studies), University of Coimbra, Colégio de S Jerónimo, Apartado 3087, 3001-401 Coimbra, Portugal; E-mail: tsp@ces.uc.pt Search for other works by this author on: Oxford Academic Google Scholar Science and Public Policy, Volume 31, Issue 3, June 2004, Pages 250–251, https://doi.org/10.1093/spp/31.3.250 Published: 01 June 2004

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.010
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: Incentives · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.996
Threshold uncertainty score0.684

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.010
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.005
Science and technology studies0.0190.018
Scholarly communication0.0150.008
Open science0.0010.006
Research integrity0.0020.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0500.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.302
Teacher spread0.280 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

Study designObservational
DomainIncentives
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2004
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueScience and Public PolicySame topicCanadian Identity and HistoryFrench-language works237,207