MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2143390259 · doi:10.5210/ojphi.v1i1.2778

Public Health Informatics and the H1N1 Pandemic

2009· article· en· W2143390259 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Joseph S. Lombardo

Bibliographic record

VenueOnline Journal of Public Health Informatics · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicData-Driven Disease Surveillance
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPublic healthPandemicMedicinePreparednessHealth informaticsPopulationInfluenza A virus subtype H5N1Public health informaticsPublic relationsMedical emergencyHealth policyEnvironmental healthInternational healthDiseasePolitical scienceInfectious disease (medical specialty)Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)NursingVirologyPathology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

General of the World Health Organization (WHO), announced that the Influenza alert level was being raised from a Phase 5 to Phase 6 indicating the start of the 2009 Pandemic.The pandemic resulted from a previously uncirculated strain of H1N1 Influenza which spread rapidly in the spring of 2009.The second wave of the pandemic began as schools reopened in the late summer.At the time of the writing of this commentary, H1N1 was widely spread in 48 states and Canada.Due to the intensive surveillance and preparedness activities surrounding a rapidly spreading avian H5N1 influenza, the WHO and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, were able to closely monitor the progression of the H1N1 strain in the human population and initiate an accelerated vaccination program.This heightened activity comes at a time of reduced budgets for state and local health departments who have primary responsibility for monitoring and containment within their jurisdictions.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.013
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.924
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0130.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.002
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.117
GPT teacher head0.371
Teacher spread0.253 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueOnline Journal of Public Health InformaticsSame topicData-Driven Disease SurveillanceFrench-language works237,207