The role of the carboxyl terminal ?-helical coiled-coil domain in osmosensing by transporter ProP ofEscherichia coli
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Concentrative uptake of osmoprotectants via transporter ProP contributes to the rehydration of Escherichia coli cells that encounter high osmolality media. A member of the major facilitator superfamily, ProP is activated by osmotic upshifts in whole bacteria, in cytoplasmic membrane vesicles and in proteoliposomes prepared with the purified protein. Soluble protein ProQ is also required for full osmotic activation of ProP in vivo. ProP is differentiated from structural and functional homologues by its osmotic activation and its C-terminal extension, which is predicted to form an alpha-helical coiled-coil. A synthetic polypeptide corresponding to the C-terminus of ProP (ProP-p) formed a dimeric alpha-helical coiled-coil. A derivative of transporter ProP lacking 26 C-terminal amino acids was expressed but inactive. A derivative harbouring amino acid changes K460I, Y467I and H495I (each at the core, coiled-coil 'a' position) required a larger osmotic upshift for activation than did the wild type transporter. The same changes extended, stabilized and altered the oligomeric state of the coiled-coil formed by ProP-p. Amino acid change R488I (also at the 'a' position) further increased the magnitude of the osmotic upshift required to activate ProP, reduced the activity attained and rendered ProP activation transient. Unexpectedly, replacement R488I destabilized the coiled-coil formed by ProP-p. The activity and osmotic activation of ProP were even more strongly attenuated by helix-destabilizing change I474P. These data demonstrate that the carboxyl terminal domain of ProP can form a homodimeric alpha-helical coiled-coil with unusual properties. They implicate the C-terminal domain in the osmotic activation of ProP.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".