On the application of very low rate error control coding to CDMA
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In code division multiple access (CDMA), the bandwidth of the transmitted signal is spread over a much larger bandwidth than that of the baseband signal yielding the so-called processing gain of the spread spectrum system. This spectrum spreading is usually performed using a pseudo-random (PN) sequence, but random coding analysis has indicated that bandwidth spreading using very low rate error correcting codes may lead to a larger system capacity over spreading based on PN sequence only. Hence a low rate convolutional code or combination of a low rate code and a spreading sequence could be used to improve the CDMA system capacity. We present an analysis of the CDMA capacity for the reverse, or uplink channel, from the mobile user to the base station. Using a constant overall bandwidth expansion, for a given target bit error probability we obtain the best sharing of the CDMA bandwidth between the error correcting code and the PN sequence. We can therefore evaluate the improvement in system capacity that can be obtained over more traditional CDMA systems where almost all the bandwidth expansion is due to the PN sequence spreading only.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it