MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2143605646 · doi:10.1667/rr3408

DNA Interduplex Crosslinks Induced by Al<sub>Kα</sub>X Rays under Vacuum

2005· article· en· W2143605646 on OpenAlexaff
Zhongli Cai, Pierre Cloutier, Léon Sanche, Darel J. Hunting

Bibliographic record

VenueRadiation Research · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicDNA and Nucleic Acid Chemistry
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Sherbrooke
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDNARadiochemistryChemistryMaterials scienceBiochemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Dry pGEM-3Zf(-) plasmid DNA was exposed to Al(kalpha) X rays (1.5 keV) for various times in an ultra-high vacuum chamber with mean absorbed dose rates ranging from 1.8 to 41.7 Gy s(-1). The different forms of plasmid DNA were separated by neutral agarose gel electrophoresis and quantified by staining and laser scanning. In addition to the bands for supercoiled, nicked circular, linear and concatameric forms of plasmid DNA, two additional bands were observed in X-irradiated samples; these migrated at rates similar to those for 8-kb and >10-kb linear double-stranded DNA. Digestion of irradiated DNA with the restriction enzymes EcoR1 and PvuI suggested that the two slowly migrating bands were interduplex crosslinked DNA. Alkaline agarose gel electrophoresis of irradiated DNA digested with EcoR1 confirmed that the interduplex crosslink was covalent. Exposure-response curves were determined for the formation of nicked circular, linear and interduplex crosslinked DNA as well as for the loss of supercoiled and concatameric DNA. Formation and loss of these species were independent of absorbed dose rate over a 20-fold range. The G values for DNA single-strand breaks, double-strand breaks and crosslinks were determined to be 62 +/- 6, 5.6 +/- 0.6 and 16 +/- 4 nmol J(-1), respectively. The formation of DNA interduplex crosslinks appears to be due to single event. The mechanism responsible for the formation of DNA interduplex crosslinks is discussed with emphasis on its implications in vivo.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.045
Threshold uncertainty score0.665

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.345
Teacher spread0.319 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations23
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRadiation ResearchSame topicDNA and Nucleic Acid ChemistryFrench-language works237,207