Patient Knowledge in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: Back to Basics
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Patient education is integral to the care of patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), and a cornerstone of self-management in chronic illness. We aimed to assess information needs and knowledge of patients with COPD. The Lung Information Needs Questionnaire (LINQ) and The Mount Sinai Hospital Questionnaire (MSHQ) were used. The LINQ identifies what COPD information the patient has, or is lacking. Higher scores in the LINQ define a greater information need. The MSHQ assesses a patients' COPD knowledge. Higher scores in the MSHQ questionnaire indicate greater knowledge. Subjects, in (n = 38) and outpatients (n = 43) were aged (mean ± SD) 69 ± 9 years, 53% were women, and 36% had not completed high school. COPD was diagnosed 9 ± 7 years previously. Forty percent had recalled receiving specific COPD education. Mean forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) was 1.1 ± 0.6 Liters. Patients on average had a 29 ± 14% need for information as assessed by the LINQ. Patients indicated a 52 ± 34% need for information on diet and 43 ± 25% for self-management. The mean total score for the MSHQ was 71 ± 13%. The score on treatment was 76 ± 20% and 60 ± 14% on pathophysiology. There was a positive relationship between having prior COPD education, finishing high school and total MSHQ score (p < 0.05) and a positive correlation of prior COPD education and reduced LINQ total score (p < 0.01). Patients with COPD have received information and demonstrate some knowledge about their disease. However, there remains a need for more education on diet and self-management.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".