A dramatic case of non-episodic angioedema with eosinophilia
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Gleich Syndrome, also known as episodic angioedema with eosinophilia, was first described in 1984 by Gleich et al as a rare cause of hypereosinophilia. Angioedema with eosinophilia can be classified into 2 types: episodic or non-episodic. We present a dramatic case of non-episodic angioedema with eosinophilia in a young male. A 34 year old construction worker, presented to the emergency department in the summer of 2008 complaining of generalized fatigue, muscle aches and upper extremities swelling with no evidence of skin rash. He had been vacationing at his trailer in Southeastern Ontario, but denies any trauma, bug bites or new medications. Initial investigations showed a marginallly elevated WBC and eosinophils. He was discharged home on comfort measures only, but returned to hospital 2 days later complaining of shortness of breath, pleuritic chest pain and rapidly progressing generalized edema involving his face, neck, arms, upper chest and abdomen. His blood work showed markedly elevated WBC and eosinophilia peaking at 62.6x10(9) cells/L and 45.70x10(9) cells/L, respectively. A CT scan of the chest revealed bilateral pleural effusions, where as a cardiac MRI demonstrated a small pericardiac effusion. A bone marrow aspiration and biopsy confirmed marked hypereosinophilia with no leukemic features. A triceps muscle biopsy demonstrated marked eosinophilic infiltration. This patient responded well to oral steroids started at 1mg/kg with a slow tapering regimen and developed no permanent organ damage. Thorough work up failed to identify any cause for his condition, including a lack of FIP1L-PDGFRA gene. His WBC and eosinophil count returned to normal values in 3 months with no recurrence of angioedema for one year.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".