Absence of behavioral abnormalities and neurodegeneration <i>in vivo</i> despite widespread neuronal huntingtin inclusions
Bibliographic record
Abstract
We have serendipitously established a mouse that expresses an N-terminal human huntingtin (htt) fragment with an expanded polyglutamine repeat (approximately 120) under the control of the endogenous human promoter (shortstop). Frequent and widespread htt inclusions occur early in shortstop mice. Despite these inclusions, shortstop mice display no clinical evidence of neuronal dysfunction and no neuronal degeneration as determined by brain weight, striatal volume, and striatal neuronal count. These results indicate that htt inclusions are not pathogenic in vivo. In contrast, the full-length yeast artificial chromosome (YAC) 128 model with the identical polyglutamine length and same level of transgenic protein expression as the shortstop demonstrates significant neuronal dysfunction and loss. In contrast to the YAC128 mouse, which demonstrates enhanced susceptibility to excitotoxic death, the shortstop mouse is protected from excitotoxicity, providing in vivo evidence suggesting that neurodegeneration in Huntington disease is mediated by excitotoxic mechanisms.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".