Solvent effects in butyl acrylate and vinyl acetate homopolymerizations in toluene
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract A series of butyl acrylate (BA) and vinyl acetate (VAc) homopolymerizations in toluene was conducted to investigate the effect of solvent at different solvent and chain transfer agent (CTA) concentrations. Because the experimental determination of the individual propagation and termination rate constants for these systems is challenging, experimental observations were limited to the lumped rate constant ( k p / k ). Differences in the lumped rate constant, at different solvent and CTA concentrations, were assumed to be attributed to the effect of solvent on the termination rate constant. Our hypothesis was that the termination rate constant k t was affected by the presence of solvent. At higher solvent concentrations, chain transfer to solvent occurs more frequently and leads to the formation of shorter chains, which move more easily and are able to terminate more quickly compared to longer chains. Thus, k t will increase, leading to a decrease in the lumped rate constant. The experimental results confirmed the presence of a solvent effect on the lumped rate constant. This effect was more pronounced in the case of VAc compared to BA solution homopolymerizations. Under the investigated conditions, increased CTA concentrations did not substantially affect the rate of BA homopolymerizations, whereas a slight synergistic effect between the CTA and solvent at higher CTA and solvent concentrations was apparent for VAc homopolymerizations. © 2004 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 94: 871–876, 2004
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".