Bibliographic record
Abstract
Acne vulgaris is a common disturbing disease that affects the majority of adolescents, but its impact on mental health in this age group is poorly understood. (1) To raise the awareness of psychological impact of acne on adolescents. (2) Identify high risk patients and provide appropriate intervention to avoid long term consequences. A literature review was based on Medline search, PsychINFO, EMBASE and CINHAL using the terms acne vulgaris in combination with adolescents, self-esteem, psychology, psychiatry, suicide, anxiety and depression. Cross sectional and cohort studies of the last 10 years (2000–2010) were selected to be analyzed and discussed in this review. We identified 7 cross sectional studies and 1 cohort study (6918 patients). Overall reviewing of these articles showed that adolescents with acne suffer from more depressive symptoms, lower self esteem and lower quality of life when compared to adolescents without acne. Severity of acne was not related to these morbidities. How acne affects an adolescent’s wellbeing is underappreciated. Increased understanding of the psychiatric comorbidities associated with acne and identifying the high-risk patients and intervening early will ultimately improve the patient’s life.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".