Comparative microscopic and molecular analysis of Thatcher near‐isogenic lines with wheat leaf rust resistance genes <i>Lr2a</i> , <i>Lr3</i> , <i>LrB</i> or <i>Lr9</i> upon challenge with different <i>Puccinia triticina</i> races
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Thatcher near‐isogenic lines (NILs) of wheat carrying resistance gene Lr2a , Lr3 , LrB or Lr9 were inoculated with Puccinia triticina races of virulence phenotype BBBD, MBDS, SBDG and FBDJ. Puccinia triticina infection structures were analysed under the fluorescence microscope over a course of 14 days after inoculation (dai). The relative proportion of P. triticina and wheat genomic DNA in infected leaves was estimated with a semiquantitative multiplex PCR analysis using P. triticina ‐ and wheat‐specific primers. The occurrence of a hypersensitive response (HR), cellular lignification and callose deposition in inoculated plants was investigated microscopically. In interactions producing highly resistant infection type (IT) ‘0;’, a maximum of two haustorial mother cells per infection site were produced, and there was no increase in the proportion of P. triticina genomic DNA in infected leaves, indicating the absence of P. triticina growth. In comparison, sizes of P. triticina colonies increased gradually in interactions producing moderately resistant IT ‘1’ and ‘2’, with the highest proportion of P. triticina genomic DNA found in leaves sampled at 14 dai. In interactions producing susceptible IT ‘3–4’, the highest proportion of P. triticina genomic DNA was found in leaves sampled at 10 dai (45·5–51·5%). HR and cellular lignification were induced in interactions producing IT ‘0;’ and ‘1’ at 1 dai but they were not observed in interactions producing IT ‘2’ until 2 dai. No HR or cellular lignification were induced in interactions producing susceptible IT ‘3–4’. Furthermore, a strong deposition of callose was induced in Lr9 + BBBD and Lr9 + FBDJ (IT ‘0;’), whereas this defence response was not induced in resistant or susceptible interactions involving Lr2a , Lr3 or LrB, indicating that Lr9 mediated resistance was different from that conditioned by Lr2a , Lr3 or LrB .
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".